So the 90th Anniversary Exhibition — Reclaiming Punggol, has come and gone.
For the anniversary show, I exhibited 4 photographs, taken in the ‘heart’ of Punggol — some in the wilderness, some in the vicinity of the flats. Some artists seek meaning in their works after the photograph is developed, others have their intentions crafted and sculpted to detail before they create. As for Jasmine, she starts off with an idea and tries to slowly stretch her understandings and meanings into the work in progress.
Punggol is a place in Singapore, currently rather remote, its only buildings are labyrinths of silence and a distinct lack of human breath. I thought of Punggol as a metaphor of change, of change about to happen, change happening, change that ironically stays constant and always existent. The buildings will change in the sense that they will multiply, and devour the wetlands and weeds, the wetlands too will change, and disappear. Strangely, it is the natural and organic jungle that should grow instead of turn lifeless, but ironically, the concrete jungle will grow, and turn alive from its original lifeless state. And so I thought, Punggol is a chrysalis of change — a change within a change that cannot be changed.
The old and new in Punggol are warring, the old mansion — the last mansion near the coastline in the Northeast, threatened to be demolished; the elements of man and nature warring again. The new buildings threaten to run upon their pillared legs and plunder the wealth of history and quaint nostalgia, in the deep soil of aged pig droppings, where the farms used to be.
As I tread on my feet and also in my mind, upon a silver thread of reflective thought, I continued pondering my idea of duality (man-made versus nature within change) and onto the idea of a utopia and a dystopia. The current emptiness in the flats, the lack of residents, deeply struck me as a dystopia — the abandoned old town iconotype; but the beauty in the wilderness: the butterflies, the weeds, the beach and the balmy sunshine, the wetlands and mud puddles, the beach and continuous waves, they all spoke of a utopia, a paradise. There, an oxymoron existed. Is Punggol, or perhaps, was Punggol then (I say this because of rapid development) a dystopia, or a utopia? As I mused, I concluded onto my last idea — that Punggol was most definitely then, a utopia for a person seeking some kind of space, public space, personal space, breathing space. But soon it will be a dystopia, upon this idea.
The idea of space soon wove into my thoughts. In a block of flats, a person is entitled to a little slice of space and sky, approximately all that they can peer out of their windows and that little area of corridor they receive. But right now, before the flats wholly swallow Punggol, the people who leisurely fish, or fly their helicopter toys, possess the entire sky and the vast horizons that border Malaysia and Ubin, a person has so much more space. And this has and will change, ironically, to make ‘more space for everyone else’, only to truly reduce space for anyone at all.
But I suppose and lament, Punggol, the utopia, like the large amount of space a person can clutch on to, is transient, as everything else.
***
To speak of my works, I’ll say I intentionally desaturated them, to mute their colours and to disarm them of some sort of vibrancy — I do not want to portray Punggol as serene, or full or life, than a utopia bordering on dystopia. I want this face of Punggol that I capture to appear ominious, to look prophetic, to foretell something that will happen, and also to contrast and juxtapose two opposing ideas or forces, and portray a picture in its duality; whilst speaking depth and story in an object.

Alien
I wanted to juxtapose an icon of the forces of man and nature together (I had this idea firmly plastered in my mind as I squatted to take a shot from the eye level of the idol.) He is Fu, or ‘Fortune’, from the Chinese or Taoist trio of Fu, Lu, Shou (Fortune, Wealth, Longevity). Ironically enough, he certainly will not bring fortune to the stretch of wild weeds he surveys — also, as an idol worshipped by people, we wonder what his business is in the wilderness: is it to devour nature, or let nature (in the form of barnacles) devour him? Did anybody used to come by to pay respect? Or … does the erecting of an idol here, show that people will be coming in the future, in a prophetic twist of fate? Nevertheless, he is an alien to his surroundings, waiting to conquer, or perhaps, seize it.

Approaching/Encroaching
Approaching is the original title — followed by Encroaching. I am sure it is quite evident, subtlety or not, as to what I was suggesting. A cluster of buildings, temporarily barricaded by a zinc fence, seems to be making its way to conquer the meek grass beyond it. The clouds in the sky, rolling in a majestic, smoky sort of way, similar to the clouds of dust risen as troops kick up a storm across a battlefield, lends a sense of movement to an otherwise eerily still photograph. Do you think the buildings are stealthily uprooting their pillared feet and inching towards the grasslands?

Deeper/Noise
Deeper is its original name, to depict a core to the nature within Punggol — its river. As the saying goes that a river is the source of all great civilisations and water to all life, I thought this photo epitomized the natural life within Punggol (after their old farms were removed). However, before the exhibition, I changed the name to Noise, paying tribute to the real situation as I took the photograph. I approached the river out of a sheer devilish din that echoed from a far distance away — it sounded like ducks, or some mad ranch of animals. I treaded onto the rocks upon the river and squatted to take the photo out of pure curiosity, attempting to capture the mystery of the noise within. Through the lens I caught a few glimpses of dogs (Punggol’s wild dog population is shockingly large). Upon reflection, the noise of the dogs probably arose from a fear and a resistance to the footsteps of humans approaching, another collision between man and nature, and our (my) inexorable attempts to conquer it, even if out of curiosity.

Frontline
Frontline juxtaposes the old building of the mansion with that of the high-rise flats in the distance. I used the word, ‘frontline’, as a metaphor for a war, between old nostalgia and impending change. Visually, not only does the two subjects’ ages differ, their textures, their shapes, their exuded airs differ, the amount of space they connote differ. This mansion, is hollow, with its doors demolished and space spilling in and flowing within it. The flats in the distance, they are sequenced and divided spaces, almost looking enviously at the — ruin –, almost wishing to be like them, but out of jealousy and rage, attacking to remove them.